Evaluation reports are either openly accessible via pdf download, or accessible via MSF's internal Sharepoint, which is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and resulting content. However, there are ongoing discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as

This evaluation of MSF OCP concerns the review of MSF-OCP's emergency intervention for South-Sudanese refugees in Ethiopia, early 2014 (part of an intentional global review of MSF response to crises with major population Displacement - decision IB/5 DG, 2014). Here in Gambella, the response to well-known 11 priorities/refugee needs is checked out systematically - while the initial reactivity is fair, there are some limitations concerning know how in key operational domains (cf details in report).

Michel Janssens, Olivier Blondeau, Vincent Brown

Cette évaluation de MSF-OCP concerne la revue critique de l’intervention MSF en urgence pour les réfugiés sud-soudanais en Ethiopie, début 2014 (partie de l’intention d’une revue globale des réponses MSF aux crises avec déplacements massifs de pop°– décision du BI/5 DG MSF, 2014). Ici à Gambella, la réponse aux 11 priorités connues / besoins des réfugiés est vérifiée systématiquement – alors que la réactivité initiale est satisfaisante, il existe une certaine perte de savoir-faire dans des domaines opérationnels majeurs (cf détails dans le rapport).

Michel Janssens, Olivier Blondeau, Vincent Brown

After the 12 January 2010 earthquake in Port-au-Prince, 4 MSF sections (OCG, OCA, OCP and OCB) decided to build container hospitals to respond to the health care needs (including Léogâne). All of these prefabricated structures, though varying in quality, were unique in that they were partially or completely built from modular containers (with different architectural designs). Construction was done by subcontractors, MSF teams trained in construction, or a combination of the two.

Monique Lathelize, Marie-Laure Le Coconnier, Julien Bégou

A successful intervention is described in the evaluation report; yet questions raised on the MSF role in Cholera response and how it could go beyond a mainly curative response. In Haiti OCG teams applied innovative approaches for the management of Cholera in pregnant women, for decentralised care in remote rural areas and for the treatment of excreta in treatment facilities. Social mobilisation was the key for rapid intervention and scale up. MSF had an important technical lead role in the nation-wide Cholera response.

Isabel Bergeri

Revue reflexion Day covering all major aspects related to cholera control and case management issues; covers 3 parts with BOX Recommendations along the text (minutes of the day) : - Operational Dynamics and Epidemiology - Technical aspects (CTC and CTU, ORP) - Innovative strategies : WATSAN and rural approach ("Marathon ORS")


Journée de Revue/Réflexion choléra Haïti (3 volets majeurs) : demandé / desk urgences, ce travail (terrain + départements) a permis de cibler des questions récurrentes dans les pratiques : dynamique opés/épidémio, techniques (CTC , UTC), innovations (rural + watsan).


In early 2010 MSF/OCB responded to an increase of malaria in northern parts of Burundi The objectives of the intervention were: To reduce morbidity and mortality related to malaria in the area of intervention (general) and to ensure that the population in the area of intervention had access to preventive and curative measures against malaria.

Carina Johansson

This review looks at OCB’s response, in terms of reactivity / timeliness during the first month after the Earth Quake in Haiti 2010. It also makes a comparison with OCG's, as well as MDM-France's responce.

Anneli Eriksson