Photos: 

Some evaluation reports are public and can be downloaded from this website, while others are restricted to MSF users and can only be accessed via Tukul. This limitation is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and the resulting content. However, there are internal discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as www.insideOCB.com.

Country/Region

In the last decade, while facing increasingly complex “projects”, MSF-OCP has chosen to add means to improve its interventions. This results in the actual growth syndrome of MSF-OCP HQ departments, which is also significantly impacting country coordination (CC) set-ups and means. New scenarios should be tested, notably for mono-projects (to revise), the idea being to reduce CC set-ups whenever possible. Resources' analyses highlight the importance of competent persons to follow (coordinators & key positions), including PCs, with a clearer career path.

Marie‐Laure Le Coconnier
01/08/2013

This evaluation aimed at gaining perspective on and learning from current partnership practices, informing the debate on MSF’s policy on partnerships and providing guidance for future engagement. Four separate field evaluations in DRC, Kenya, Niger and North Korea as well as a desk review of seven additional partnerships have been conducted. The report provides good practice examples and practical recommendations.

Karima Hammadi and Annie Désilets
01/02/2012

In recent years, MSF has recognized the need to improve its handover process and outcomes. It is no longer satisfactory for the organization to enter a country, put in place a program and leave without taking some accountability for what remains after MSF’s departure. It is in this spirit that I accepted to come to Lesotho to evaluate a handover tool that was implemented here during the initial phase of the handover.

Annie Désilets
30/04/2010

After an initial period of three years in Lesotho, MSF has decided to extend its presence in the country for two more years and to launch a second phase of the project primarily focused on intensifying the transfer of responsibility for the programme to local health authorities and partners. This is due partly to the administrative process now underway in Lesotho to decentralise to local government, coupled with related health sector reforms, which have divided the former catchment area of Scott Hospital Health Service Area into two districts with different management structures.

Guillaume Jouquet
01/07/2009

Internal report An Ebola outbreak was declared in Uganda on 29th of November 2007. An MSF Intervention took place between 1st of December 2007 and 18th January 2008. This report summarises, after general issues, the main points on intersection coordination, coordination with other/external actors, human resources management, expat health and project set up.

admin
09/06/2008

MSF-CH has been working in Gulu since 2003, supporting different health structures and running a shelter for “night commuters”. This evaluation was initiated by the desk, mainly because the progress of this project was slow and there were doubts whether it addresses real needs. Hence the general objective of the evaluation was to review the intervention in Gulu and determine its Relevance, Effectiveness and Efficiency. In addition Perception, Co-ordination and Exit strategies were looked at. The evaluation was carried out between September and October 2005.

admin
01/10/2005

An evaluation of the nutritional situation of accessible areas in Marsabit district, aiming to determine the appropriateness of MSF’s program within the actual situation.

Contents

Brown, V.
01/08/1997

Since October 1991, the Rift Valley, Western and Nyanza provinces of Kenya have been affected by ethnic clashes. The violence has resulted in over 1,500 deaths and approximately 300,000 displaced people. MSF opened its mission in February 1994. To achieve its goal, 3 key strategies were adopted:1) to provide relief by working through churches & local NGOs and strengthening their capacity,2) to hire national staff with the same status and responsibilities than MSF expatriates and 3) to enhance local community participation in the mission activities.

Serge Manoncourt
01/09/1995

Pages