Photos: 

Some evaluation reports are public and can be downloaded from this website, while others are restricted to MSF users and can only be accessed via Tukul. This limitation is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and the resulting content. However, there are internal discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as www.insideOCB.com.

Country/Region

MSF OCBA , Review of Partnership 2011-2013 Helsinki Citizen Assembly - MSF OCBA Istanbul - Kilis Migrants Syria Refugees Gaias Consulting C. Boulanger Soma

FDESTENABES
28/08/2014

The MSF-OCG handover process of the nutritional programme in Zinder was evaluated with the objective to assess best practices, challenges and lessons learnt of the handover/integration process of the Zinder CRENI to the hospital, with the main purpose to improve handover processes in such contexts as well as decision-making in future projects. The evaluation has confirmed the pertinence of MSF in Zinder since 2005 and has contributed to the reduction of the infant mortality rate.

Jonathan Novoa Cain
01/08/2014

La revue critique des projets de Zinder et Magaria couvrant les années 2011 à 2013 a été commissionnée pour évaluer la pertinence et l'efficacité des programmes, l’impact éventuel des changements à l’échelle régionale et nationale sur la capacité de MSF à atteindre ses objectifs et la pertinence des stratégies d’adaptation. Points généraux : L'évaluation confirme les acquis de la mission dans sa capacité de mener à bien les services hospitaliers pédiatriques et nutritionnels de qualité.

Jean-Paul Jemmy et Ingrid Kircher
01/08/2014

La chimio-prévention du paludisme saisonnier (CPS) a été mise en œuvre au Niger en 2013, conformément aux recommandations de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS) et à la politique nationale de lutte contre le paludisme. Elle s’est déroulée sous la forme d’une campagne de masse qui a consisté en l’administration de doses curatives de sulphadoxine-pyriméthamine et d'amodiaquine durant trois jours, à un mois d’intervalle entre juillet et novembre, aux enfants de 3 à 59 mois.

Alena KOSCALOVA, Fassouma OUSMANE and Enrique JIMENEZ
01/02/2014

In the last decade, while facing increasingly complex “projects”, MSF-OCP has chosen to add means to improve its interventions. This results in the actual growth syndrome of MSF-OCP HQ departments, which is also significantly impacting country coordination (CC) set-ups and means. New scenarios should be tested, notably for mono-projects (to revise), the idea being to reduce CC set-ups whenever possible. Resources' analyses highlight the importance of competent persons to follow (coordinators & key positions), including PCs, with a clearer career path.

Marie‐Laure Le Coconnier
01/08/2013

This evaluation aimed at gaining perspective on and learning from current partnership practices, informing the debate on MSF’s policy on partnerships and providing guidance for future engagement. Four separate field evaluations in DRC, Kenya, Niger and North Korea as well as a desk review of seven additional partnerships have been conducted. The report provides good practice examples and practical recommendations.

Karima Hammadi and Annie Désilets
01/02/2012

Zahedan Project for Afghan refugees in Iran : 1st a necessary historical review; and an analysis of the political and technical relevance of the project (10 years). MSF could have proposed earlier health activities directly oriented for local Iraniens. The adequacy of means related to project objectives is considered satisfactory.

Tommaso Fabbri & Vincent Brown
01/04/2011

Reviewed Interventions This chapter provides an overview of the contexts and MSF interventions of all the reviewed interventions (DRC, Cameroun, Djibouti, Iraq, South Africa and Pakistan).

Alena Koscalova, Elena Lucchi
16/12/2010

Four years after the 2005 Niger crisis, many things have changed in the nutrition field. This cahier aims at considering this evolution and exploring new possibilities for action for MSF: how can these changes  get MSF to reconsider its own goals and move its areas of intervention? How can new knowledge and the experience gained by our teams since the crisis in Niger lead to new operational ambitions?
 

Jean-Hervé Bradol, Jean-Hervé Jézéquel
01/06/2010

The purpose of this evaluation was to review the experience in needs assessment and response to displacement in open settings. For the evaluation process, six interventions were reviewed: MSF Operational Centre Geneva (OCG) interventions in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (Haut-Uélé), Djibouti, Cameroon and Iraq; Operational Centre Brussels (OCB) interventions in South Africa and Pakistan; and partial review of Operational Centre Paris (OCP) experience in Pakistan.

Alena Koscalova and Elena Lucchi
01/06/2010

Pages