Some evaluation reports are public and can be downloaded from this website, while others are restricted to MSF users and can only be accessed via Tukul. This limitation is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and the resulting content. However, there are internal discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as Alternatively, if you are interested in receiving a copy of an evaluation report, please contact us

MSF-CH responded to 20 epidemics between 2006 and mid 2007; all of these were rapidely reviewed. Seven interventions (three on holera, four on meningitis response) were chosen for in-depth analysis, including a reconstruction of the epidemiological curves.


Internal report An Ebola outbreak was declared in Uganda on 29th of November 2007. An MSF Intervention took place between 1st of December 2007 and 18th January 2008. This report summarises, after general issues, the main points on intersection coordination, coordination with other/external actors, human resources management, expat health and project set up.



Sibylle Gerstl and Kate Alberti (on behalf of Epicentre)

This evaluation was carried out with the purpose to improve response to epidemics within the OCG. The evaluation team was asked to synthesise lessons learned from different interventions, and to look at decision-making processes involved in launching epidemic response, timing of interventions, and choice of intervention strategies.

Josep M. Escribà Jordana and Sabine Kampmüller

The project in Lichinga is a vertical program addressing HIV/Aids in one of the northern provinces of Mozambique. The approach of integrating activities in the existing health services is rather new, hence it was felt important to evaluate the current strategy in order to support future planning and draw lessons. The purpose of the evaluation was to assess whether the integration and decentralization strategies are appropriate and efficient in order to reach to overall objective of the project. The evaluation was carried out between Mid May and Mid June 2005, by two evaluators.