Photos: 

Some evaluation reports are public and can be downloaded from this website, while others are restricted to MSF users and can only be accessed via Tukul. This limitation is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and the resulting content. However, there are internal discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as www.insideOCB.com.

Country/Region

After the 12 January 2010 earthquake in Port-au-Prince, 4 MSF sections (OCG, OCA, OCP and OCB) decided to build container hospitals to respond to the health care needs (including Léogâne). All of these prefabricated structures, though varying in quality, were unique in that they were partially or completely built from modular containers (with different architectural designs). Construction was done by subcontractors, MSF teams trained in construction, or a combination of the two.

Monique Lathelize, Marie-Laure Le Coconnier, Julien Bégou
02/02/2012

- L’évaluation technique demandée par les ROL (Resp Opés Log) de 5 OCs MSF a permis de capitaliser sur une liste de produits pertinents/construction de la conception à la réalisation. Les projets MSF ont tous abouti (ça marche !), mais un Comité de Projet permanent doit garantir le suivi de projets aussi ambitieux. - La réalisation en urgence pour certains (6 à 8 mois) doit être modulée en fonction des exigences de qualité, projet à moyen terme (3 à 5 ans). - L’utilisation de conteneurs est pertinente en post-séisme, mais la durabilité des matériaux reste un facteur à prendre en compte.

FPENFEUNTEUN
02/02/2012

This evaluation aimed at gaining perspective on and learning from current partnership practices, informing the debate on MSF’s policy on partnerships and providing guidance for future engagement. Four separate field evaluations in DRC, Kenya, Niger and North Korea as well as a desk review of seven additional partnerships have been conducted. The report provides good practice examples and practical recommendations.

Karima Hammadi and Annie Désilets
01/02/2012

A successful intervention is described in the evaluation report; yet questions raised on the MSF role in Cholera response and how it could go beyond a mainly curative response. In Haiti OCG teams applied innovative approaches for the management of Cholera in pregnant women, for decentralised care in remote rural areas and for the treatment of excreta in treatment facilities. Social mobilisation was the key for rapid intervention and scale up. MSF had an important technical lead role in the nation-wide Cholera response.

Isabel Bergeri
01/09/2011

Revue reflexion Day covering all major aspects related to cholera control and case management issues; covers 3 parts with BOX Recommendations along the text (minutes of the day) : - Operational Dynamics and Epidemiology - Technical aspects (CTC and CTU, ORP) - Innovative strategies : WATSAN and rural approach ("Marathon ORS")

FPENFEUNTEUN
08/04/2011

Journée de Revue/Réflexion choléra Haïti (3 volets majeurs) : demandé / desk urgences, ce travail (terrain + départements) a permis de cibler des questions récurrentes dans les pratiques : dynamique opés/épidémio, techniques (CTC , UTC), innovations (rural + watsan).

FPENFEUNTEUN
08/04/2011

This review looks at OCB’s response, in terms of reactivity / timeliness during the first month after the Earth Quake in Haiti 2010. It also makes a comparison with OCG's, as well as MDM-France's responce.

Anneli Eriksson
18/10/2010

Following the devastating earthquake in Haiti in January 2010, MSF’s Committee of Executive Directors decided to conduct a global review of MSF’s response to the disaster. This exercise covered the interventions of the five operational centres and consisted of six specific reviews looking at the different axes of the response: global/operational, medical/surgical, logistic/supply, communication, human resources and fund raising. An intended inter-sectional finance review and/or audit did not take place. Evaluators consider this the biggest limitation of this review exercise.

This evaluation was conducted by Francis Coteur (Logistics), Luis Encinas (Medical/Patient perception), Amaia Esparza (Communications), Paula Frankema (Global/Operations), Karine Klein (Fundraising), Laura Kopczak (Supply), Juli Niebuhr (Human Resources), Roger Teck (Medical), Johan von Schreeb (Medical/Surgical), Sabine Kampmüller (Process facilitation, Executive report), Ewald Stals (Team Leader) on behalf of the MSF Vienna Evaluation Unit.
12/04/2010

This evaluation was requested by MSF CH Geneva and focuses on the pertinence, efficacy and impact of the sexual violence project in Guatemala. The motivation to evaluate this program stemmed from difficulties at the initial stages of the project in realizing the goals through the original strategies chosen. The results answer key questions about the added value of the intervention regarding the problem of the sexual violence (SV).

María Luisa Cabrera Pérez-Armiñan and Marilyn McHarg
10/03/2009

Pages