Photos: 

Some evaluation reports are public and can be downloaded from this website, while others are restricted to MSF users and can only be accessed via Tukul. This limitation is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and the resulting content. However, there are internal discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as www.insideOCB.com.

Topic

Country/Region

- Revue du Projet d’assistance aux réfugiés de RDC, Betou, Congo Bza: a été réalisée en cours de projet et permet de ré-orienter les objectifs/ priorités sanitaires, et de préciser le cadre de l’évolution par rapport à des sujets majeurs (HIV/Sida, Lèpre, TB, PEV, Surveillance, etc).

FPENFEUNTEUN
24/01/2012

In CAR, MSF’s medical presence finds itself unprecedentedly in the midst of a health desert. MSF intervenes in CAR to provide access to health to populations affected by the conflict in the North. Within this context, 3 MSF sections (MSF-OCBA, OCA, OCP) in CAR since 2006 requested an evaluation of their hospital-based projects. This work involves the comparison of the three projects (hospital + outreach activities) and the analysis of factors in the face of a potential handover to the MoH or other actors present in the area.

Isabelle Voiret and Vincent Brown
20/12/2011

The analysis shows a still fragile equilibrium for several components of these projects: HR, Quality Standards expected, possibilities of integration in RCA etc. Before imagining handover scenarios with the MOH and/or others actors, MSF needs to take a longer term view and define carefully the steps.

Isabelle Voiret, Vincent Brown
01/12/2011

Through an analysis of the events that have marked MSF’s history since 2003, this series of case studies and historical accounts describes the evolution of MSF's humanitarian ambitions, the resistance to these ambitions and the political arrangements that overcame this resistance (or that failed to do so).

edited by Claire Magone, Michaël Neuman, Fabrice Weissman
22/11/2011

La stratégie MSF de développer en 6 ans (90  265 lits) les activités d’un vaste complexe hospitalier en brousse (zone de conflit) est revue. Tenant compte des activités actuelles MSF/M.Santé, l’intégration difficile dans la carte sanitaire est analysée, avec propositions. Les résultats contribuent à la réflexion en cours sur les hôpitaux long terme à MSF.

Isabelle Voiret & Vincent Brown
01/10/2011

This review of operational choices and decisions in Pakistan was carried out in 2011 and has now been produced in a shorter summary version. The report provides a historical overview of OCB presence in the country and looks at the way that the operational strategy developed over time, both in response to the external factors but also as OCB used a number of strategies to create an operational space. Many of the findings remain valid today within Pakistan and also in similar missions. A full version of the report is available from Stockholm Evaluation Unit.

Boris Stringer
01/09/2011

Reviewed Interventions This chapter provides an overview of the contexts and MSF interventions of all the reviewed interventions (DRC, Cameroun, Djibouti, Iraq, South Africa and Pakistan).

Alena Koscalova, Elena Lucchi
16/12/2010

Le but de cette évaluation est de fournir des informations, améliorer le transfert et la remise des activités de MSF à Bunia (en 2010 et ensuite) ainsi que de documenter les leçons apprises du processus de désengagement afin de permettre aux autre projets de MSF de tirer profit de cet apprentissage.
Les objectifs sont d’évaluer: i) la justesse des stratégies de passation/désengagement (différentes stratégies selon les diverses composantes et activités de l’hôpital):
a. la collaboration avec le MdeS et les autres intervenants;

SCAVACO
10/12/2010

The purpose of this evaluation is to inform and improve the hand over of MSF’s activities in Bunia (in 2010 and beyond) and to document lessons from the disengagement process to enable other MSF projects to learn from it. The objectives are to evaluate: i) the appropriateness of hand-over/disengagement strategies (Different strategies for the different hospital components / activities.) a. collaboration with MoH and other actors and b.

Annie Désilets
02/06/2010

The purpose of this evaluation was to review the experience in needs assessment and response to displacement in open settings. For the evaluation process, six interventions were reviewed: MSF Operational Centre Geneva (OCG) interventions in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) (Haut-Uélé), Djibouti, Cameroon and Iraq; Operational Centre Brussels (OCB) interventions in South Africa and Pakistan; and partial review of Operational Centre Paris (OCP) experience in Pakistan.

Alena Koscalova and Elena Lucchi
01/06/2010

Pages