Photos: 

Evaluation reports are either openly accessible via pdf download, or accessible via MSF's internal Sharepoint, which is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and resulting content. However, there are ongoing discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as www.insideOCB.com.

C

 

Mid-Term Evaluation of the Kisangani Emergency Response Team (KERE) 

This report is a mid-term evaluation of the KERE project implemented by MSF OCG in DRC since 2018.  

The KERE project aims to respond to medical and humanitarian emergencies within a short time frame and through punctual medical actions aimed at limiting morbidity and mortality in the following situations: measles, cholera, malaria, influx of wounded, population displacements, and viral hemorrhagic fever. 

Caterina Monti
15/09/2021

This is a comprehensive evaluation of OCA's in country emergency response units in Nigeria, Chad, North Kivu, South Kivu and Katanga. The report consists of the transversal analysis of all of the ERUs as well as the individual evaluations of each specific ERU project. The outcomes have been reduced into Management Summary Charts found on p.8 of the report.

by Juan Luis Dominguez and Timothy McCann, supported by the Stockholm Evaluation Unit
26/03/2015

This is a comprehensive evaluation of OCA's in country emergency response units in Nigeria, Chad, North Kivu, South Kivu and Katanga. The report consists of the transversal analysis of all of the ERUs as well as the individual evaluations of each specific ERU project. The outcomes have been reduced into Management Summary Charts found on p.8 of the report.

by Juan Luis Dominguez and Timothy McCann, Stockholm Evaluation Unit
26/03/2015

This is a comprehensive evaluation of OCA's in country emergency response units in Nigeria, Chad, North Kivu, South Kivu and Katanga. The report consists of the transversal analysis of all of the ERUs as well as the individual evaluations of each specific ERU project. The outcomes have been reduced into Management Summary Charts found on p.8 of the report.

by Silvia Tomanin (Stockholm Evaluation Unit)
01/02/2015

In the last decade, while facing increasingly complex “projects”, MSF-OCP has chosen to add means to improve its interventions. This results in the actual growth syndrome of MSF-OCP HQ departments, which is also significantly impacting country coordination (CC) set-ups and means. New scenarios should be tested, notably for mono-projects (to revise), the idea being to reduce CC set-ups whenever possible. Resources' analyses highlight the importance of competent persons to follow (coordinators & key positions), including PCs, with a clearer career path.

Marie‐Laure Le Coconnier
01/08/2013

The evaluation of the PUC (Congo Emergency Pool/ Pool D’urgence Congo) finds that the project, as a full epidemiological surveillance, assessment and response system is extraordinarily well structured, having developed both a technically sound complex methodology and working tools, with a capacity for reacting to epidemiological outbursts very swiftly and effectively. It also finds that there is no other international or national organisation with such impressive medical expertise and response capacity within the context.

Juan Luis Domínguez-González
10/06/2013

This evaluation report is part of the overall report "Enriched or Confined? MSF-Engagement in Local Partnerships".

Karima Hammadi
05/03/2012

After the 12 January 2010 earthquake in Port-au-Prince, 4 MSF sections (OCG, OCA, OCP and OCB) decided to build container hospitals to respond to the health care needs (including Léogâne). All of these prefabricated structures, though varying in quality, were unique in that they were partially or completely built from modular containers (with different architectural designs). Construction was done by subcontractors, MSF teams trained in construction, or a combination of the two.

Monique Lathelize, Marie-Laure Le Coconnier, Julien Bégou
02/02/2012

- L’évaluation technique demandée par les ROL (Resp Opés Log) de 5 OCs MSF a permis de capitaliser sur une liste de produits pertinents/construction de la conception à la réalisation. Les projets MSF ont tous abouti (ça marche !), mais un Comité de Projet permanent doit garantir le suivi de projets aussi ambitieux. - La réalisation en urgence pour certains (6 à 8 mois) doit être modulée en fonction des exigences de qualité, projet à moyen terme (3 à 5 ans). - L’utilisation de conteneurs est pertinente en post-séisme, mais la durabilité des matériaux reste un facteur à prendre en compte.

FPENFEUNTEUN
02/02/2012

Pages