Some evaluation reports are public and can be downloaded from this website, while others are restricted to MSF users and can only be accessed via Tukul. This limitation is mainly due to the sensitive nature of the operational contexts and the resulting content. However, there are internal discussions about making all evaluation reports publicly searchable. If you are an MSF association member, reports are made available on various associate platforms such as www.insideOCB.com. Alternatively, if you are interested in receiving a copy of an evaluation report, please contact us

Topic

Country/Region

In November 2015, MSF-OCB launched a pilot initiative, the Field Opportunity Envelope (FOE), with the objective to give autonomy to field staffs to rapidly and without validation meet the needs of the communities in their intervention area. Each project could request either 100,000 or 200,000 euros, provided that their initiative met a set of criteria. This light review aims to take stock of how it has been received and used by operations and make recommendations for its future development.

This evaluation was conducted by Hélène JUILLARD and Clément CHARLOT on behalf of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit of MSF. Finalized in August 2017. For more information please contact evaluation.sweden@msf.org.
17/08/2017

There have been five years since MSF-OCB´s first concrete actions on torture and three years since the launch of the torture rehabilitations projects. Sufficient time has now elapsed to evaluate MSF´s trio of clinics and to make recommendations for their improvement, as well as to identify cross-cutting lessons applicable to future efforts in similar contexts. This is especially important as the clinics represent the first experiences for MSF in the specialized rehabilitation of victims.

This evaluation was conducted by Currun Singh and Eva P. Rocillo Aréchaga on behalf of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit of MSF. Finalized in February 2017. For more information please contact evaluation.sweden@msf.org
05/07/2017

In 2015 MSF-OCB launched a review to assess the perception, by the field teams, of an increased organisational “bureaucratic” burden. The review spanned three phases, from problem identification, to an in depth field study, to a final phase of webinars to improve the coverage and overall accuracy of the findings. The review process culminated in 2 missions agreeing to pilot a new monitoring and reporting system based on the principles coming out of the review, starting asap

This evaluation was conducted by Hélène Juillard, Marion Péchayre, and Lauren Weiss on behalf of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit of MSF. Finalised in May 2017
29/06/2017

In May 2016, concerns were raised at OCB HQ about the potential underestimation of the general IRFFG implementation costs. The OCB mission in Haiti had to retroactively disburse an unbudgeted 1.33M€ of severance pay to their staff, more than a year after the IRFFG implementation in the country.

This publication was produced by Stockholm Evaluation Unit at the request of Muriel Cornelis (HR Director OCB). It was prepared independently by Yves Sonnay.
22/06/2017

In the last few years, MSF OCG has developed an Operational Policy with the ambition to increase and improve the quantity and quality of secondary health care structures (or inpatient care). This recognition has prompted the organization to take a closer look at the challenges, lessons and accomplishments in terms of hospital management to develop strategies that will enable the organization to successfully set up, govern, implement and exit inpatient projects in all types of contexts.

This evaluation was conducted by Annie Désilets and Ines Hake on behalf of the Vienna Evaluation Unit.
28/03/2017

After a very intense and difficult one week response to support the MoH Hospital with specialised burn trauma capacity, the cell and mission brought in Stockholm Evaluation Unit to facilitate an internal Retrospect process to help the team identify key lessons and to bring closure to the project team. Note, the Retrospect does not aim to make independent judgement or analysis, only to facilitate bringing out the lessons and to help synthesize these into actionable outcomes.

Stockholm Evaluation Unit
14/03/2017

Since MSF’s return to Afghanistan in 2009, its operations on the ground have been monitored with a spyglass, unlike any other mission in this kind of environment. Consequently, OCs have been pushed to innovate but also remain critical vis-a-vis their respective strategies and the overall modus operandi of the Afghan mission. This evaluation of the single representation set up aims to analyse and learn from the current state of affairs of the Afghan mission in view of possible ways forward.

This evaluation was conducted by Dan Sermand & Cedric Martin on behalf of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit of MSF. Finalised in Dec 2016.
17/02/2017

MSF OCG’s Initiative for Medical Innovation (2IM) has successfully introduced the beginnings of a change in organisational culture through a number of innovation projects. Every department has now adopted the notion of innovation and risk taking and a mindset of challenging the status quo. We have found evidence that the 2IM Initiative has, with a degree of success, started to address an identified latent risk aversion in OCG. Any form of organisational change must be expected to lead to tensions within the status quo, and to some extend this was even intended and deemed necessary.

This evaluation was conducted by Peter Giesen, Lydia Tanner and Guy White on behalf of the MSF Vienna Evaluation Unit.
13/02/2017

SSP was formed in the aftermath of a high profile depot crisis in South Africa in 2012/3, with six organisations, already dealing with drug stock outs joining forces to tackle the issue. The different organisations brought different skills to the table. Largely focused on anti-retrovirals (ARVs) and TB medication, from the beginning the SSP has tasked itself to hold government accountable, to perform a watchdog role and to present the patient view on stock outs.

This evaluation was conducted by Andrew McKenzie and Timothy McCann on behalf of the Stockholm Evaluation Unit of MSF
11/01/2017

With the deterioration of the political context in Burundi since April 2015 more than 140,000 refugees have arrived in Tanzania. The refugees are hosted in three camps in Kigoma region, together with 83,000 Congolese refugees living in Nyarugusu camp for almost 20 years. The initial influx of Burundi refugees coincided with a cholera outbreak in Kigoma region, which triggered an immediate MSF emergency response in May 2015. This rapidly shifted with the movement of refugees from the lake shore of Tanganyika to the Nyarugusu camp.

This evaluation was conducted by Alena Koscalova and Yann Lelevrier on behalf of the MSF Vienna Evaluation Unit.
19/12/2016

Pages